At Spend Matters, most of our time is spent actually looking at solutions and evaluating and validating detailed RFI responses. So when a procurement organization asks us, for example, “how doesSAP Aribacompare toCoupafor source-to-pay,” we can provide a detailed explanation across hundreds of different functional specifications and customer satisfaction benchmarks about how the two precisely compare and differentiate. We get questions on these two providers a lot.
当其他公关技术供应商达到一个里程碑oviders (as well as practitioner and consultants) start using them as a yardstick to measure and compare capabilities. And now withIvaluareaching unicorn statusand sharing current growth metrics that generally dwarf that of its larger peers — based on organic product growth — we expect to hear more and more procurement organizations ask about Ivalua in the same way they ask about SAP Ariba and Coupa. And of course from a SolutionMap perspective when it comes totechnology selection,we can answer that question with hard, objective data on a capability-by-capability basis (now mapped to procurement business requirements).
But off-the-cuff, how does Ivalua and its unified suite compare to others?
I asked my colleagues on the Spend Matters analyst team who know different areas of Ivalua (and its peers) to comment not using the SolutionMap benchmark, but their own opinion.
So without further adieu, let’s read the Spend Matters analyst team’s candid take of how Ivalua’s source-to-pay competitors measure up to it (including positives and negatives comparisons for each). Our analysis explores, on an overall company basis, subjective views about how the following vendors compare to Ivalua: Coupa, Determine (now part of Corcentric), GEP, Jaggaer, SAP Ariba, Oracle, SynerTrade and Zycus.
Do you want the objective, hard comparative data on a functional and product basis to understand how Ivalua stacks up to peers? Check outSolutionMap Insider.