apinan / Adobe股票
In the race to deliver integrated procurement technology suites, a number of vendors have focused 80% of their effort on certain areas or groupings of products (e.g., analytics, sourcing and supplier management or eProcurement and e-invoicing), while underserving others in functional depth. Yet the future of source-to-pay (S2P) solutions will not just be measured by how strong, on a relative basis, the individual components are in a handful of areas — or even collectively.
相反，花费很有信念我们将根据更全面的方法来衡量未来的套房，其中功能比较只成为等式的一部分。这些变量将包括模块之间的交叉点;每个提供商可以促进整体的生态系统;来自市场情报和相关见解的决策指导和决策支持;而且，当然，解决方案本身的基本能力。
This future bodes well for GEP from a solution perspective, and it’s why, in part, the provider has been so successful in winning business (including from the largest incumbents at some of the largest Fortune 500 customers) in the market in the past 12 months — albeit without making much noise about it. Granted, the modules within the “SMART by GEP” procurement technology product suite are not without both strengths and weaknesses (which we explore in this research brief). But overall, the combination of the individual components within SMART by GEP, the broader suite capabilities on both a collective and holistic basis, as well as the consulting, market intelligence, managed services and BPO capability that GEP delivers makes the solution set stand out in the market.
本花费事项PRO供应商快照探讨GEP的产品优势和劣势，提供事实和专家分析，以帮助采购组织决定是否应该入围供应商。它还提供了对用户界面的评价(优点/缺点)。我们分析的第1部分提供了一个公司和详细的解决方案概述，以及考虑该方案的公司的推荐适合标准列表。这个多部分系列的其余部分将提供SWOT分析，用户选择指南，竞争的替代方案和额外的评估和选择考虑。